Pour le rétablissement de la résolution 3379

Jeudi 21 janvier 2010 4 21 /01 /2010 11:49

L'affaire Al Dura/Enderlin a suscité, on le sait, bien des remouds, et a été l'occasion de voir au grand jour combien la propagande israélienne et ses relais étaient rodés. Ce n'est pas un article qui paraît quand il y a évolution dans ce dossier, mais une véritable rafale, reprise par quantité de sites, manifestant par là-même une détermination à influencer, à faire pression. On est très loin d'un contexte d'information dans lequel il s'agirait simplement de laisser la justice dire le droit.

Comme on l'a vu en effet, de façon indépendante au jugement du 21 mai 2008 qui relaxait Karsenty, poursuivi par Charles Enderlin et France 2 :

Enderlin Karsenty 21 mai 2008 Jugement Enderlin Karsenty 21 mai 2008 Jugement

une deuxième plainte est en cours concernant ce dossier. Déposée par Jamal Al Dura à l'encontre du journal Actualité Juive qui a mis en cause en septembre 2008 la réalité des blessures subies en 2000 au carrefour de Netzarim dans son numéro 1038 :

http://actuj-12pages.v1.myvirtualpaper.com/actualitejuive_1038/2008090401?page=12

suivi d'un droit de réponse de Charles Enderlin dans le numéro 1041, assorti d'un commentaire du journaliste qui a omis de fournir les pièces communiquées :

http://actuj-12pages.v1.myvirtualpaper.com/actualitejuive_1041/2008092501?page=4

que l'on peut cependant voir sur le site de l'UPJF où elles sont publiées :

http://www.upjf.org/actualiteesupjf/article-14813-145-7-al-dura-pieces-verser-audossier-futurgroupe-travail-dexpertsindependants.html

elle a fait l'objet d'un article de politis paru le 29 octobre :

http://www.politis.fr/Apres-le-drame-la-diffamation,8448.html

qui révélait que derrière le pseudo Daniel Vavinsky se cache en fait Clément Weill Raynal, rédacteur en chef adjoint de France 3 et auteur de l'article contre lequel Jamal Al Dura porte plainte. Là-dessus, la presse française est muette, ce qui frise le grotesque, puisqu'on voudrait illustrer à quel point elle est muselée, on ne trouverait pas mieux. De même on voudrait illustrer la gestion communautaire de ce dossier qui a un impact certain sur l'image d'Israël, on ne s'y prendrait pas autrement.

Ce n'est que sur les forums et les sites alternatifs que l'on a quelque information, et encore. Par contre côté israélien, c'est la grosse bertha, avec consigne de relayer au maximum. Si les moyens techniques ont nettement changé, il n'y a pas grande différence avec ces illustrations que nous avons tous connues, enfants, et qui manifestent la détermination à faire passer un message

http://faimg1.forum-auto.com/mesimages/241590/message.jpg
Ainsi, sur le forum de France 2, faut-il lire, si l'on veut prendre la mesure de la détermination à désinformer les messages d'anita 12. Il faut dire que le fou-rire, à bien des égards, est assuré, parce que si la notion de propagande est intégrée, celles de mesure et de pondération ont quelque difficulté à l'être, ce qui rend les posts parfois stupéfiants. On a là une forumeuse qui n'a aucun sens du ridicule et n'hésite pas à s'auto-citer complaisamment, énonçant en substance par ses nombreux "je l'ai dit et redit" qu'elle est la voix de la raison sur ce forum. Les critiques reçues en réponse sont bien évidemment antisémites.

Les textes à l'appui des commentaires, tous communautaires, donc, ne manquent pas, illustrés, selon, de façon très évidemment contestable. Ainsi le blog JSS dont on connait la finesse n'a-t-il pas hésité à apposer sur une photo de Charles Enderlin "Journaleux assassin". Bon de lui, on n'attendait pas autre chose.

http://jssnews.com/2010/01/19/le-parti-pris-de-charlot-enderlin/comment-page-1/

repris du blog de Victor Perez, tout aussi subtil

http://victor-perez.blogspot.com/2010/01/le-parti-pris-de-charles-enderlin.html

sans oublier :

http://www.menapress.com/article.php?sid=2562

http://www.ripostelaique.com/Philippe-Karsenty-les-consequences.html

...et il suffit de lire le fil de France 2 pour avoir tous les liens. Outre anita12, lapid est très actif, mais moins volubile, moins porté à l'auto citation, et l'annulation systématique de la parole de l'autre.

Extraits :
anita12
Posté le 04-11-2009 à 13:08:12  profilVoir le bbcodeansweranswer +MPFavoris
Prévenir les modérateurs en cas d'abus
 

Y'a quand même un problème : voilà deux fois que ce Clément Weill-Raynal est mis en cause publiquement et de manière très directe : 1) par Charles enderlin, correspondant officiel de F2 à Jérusalem 2) par le Rédacteur en Chef de l'hebdomadaire Politis. soit ce qu'ils disent est vrai et c'est quand même assez grave. soit ce qu'ils disent est faux, et alors, c'est de la diffamation. Or, dans les deux cas, (Charles Enderlin et Politis) Clément Weill Raynal s'abstient de toute réaction, de tout démenti, de tout droit de réponse. france 3 reste muette. France 2 itou. Y'aurait-il un malaise ?


 
Mais le tribunal de Paris a attesté que ce reportage n'était pas crédible apes avoir vu les rushs! ce n'est pas une photo ou l'on voit des bandages qui pourrait remettre cette conclusion en défaut!


Ce que le Tribunal n'a aucunement fait, du reste elle parle de l'arrêt d'appel joint plus haut.

anita12
Posté le 04-11-2009 à 13:51:05  profilVoir le bbcodeansweranswer +MPFavoris
Prévenir les modérateurs en cas d'abus
 
Le 04-11-2009 à 10:58:43, Esneval a écrit :


Davidoff, qu'est-ce qui te permet d'affirmer que ces accusations sont diffamatoires et mensongères ? Elles sont en tout cas claires, précises et explicites (les diffamateurs procèdent le plus souvent par allusions et par insinuations). Les articles écrits par Clément Weill-Raynal / Daniel vavinsky sont cités, le nom de l'avocat qui a porté plainte pour Jamal al Doura aussi, tout comme le nom du juge d'instruction qui a mis Clément Weill Raynal et Serge Bennatar en examen. Et le rédacteur en chef de Pollitis raconte n'importe quoi ? Il a sniffé de la colle ? Il veut s'amuser à couler son journal (convalescent d'une procédure de redressement judiciaire) avec un procès en diffamation ?  La stratégie du silence n'est pas forcément digne. Elle peut aussi être le fait des Tartuffes démasqués qui ne savent plus que dire


 
les Tartuffe sont de quel coté? pour l'instant le jugement d'appel est le seul valable! il serait etonnant qu'Enderlin n'ait pas fourni en temps et en heure toutes les pièces qui auraient pu le disculper! mais c'est sur ce faux et usage de faux est gênant surtout pour un journaliste qui s'est vu décoré ensuite ! comme quoi!!

...
anita12
Posté le 07-11-2009 à 02:44:48  profilVoir le bbcodeansweranswer +MPFavoris
Prévenir les modérateurs en cas d'abus
 
Le 06-11-2009 à 22:41:34, BelCanto00 a écrit :


ANITA, vos argument seraient excellents si vous commenciez par mettre les mots dans le bon ordre


 
ils restent donc excellents car les mots sont dans le bon ordre a moins de m'indiquer ceux qui ne le seraient pas!


Puis le plus drôle, puisque si la presse communautaire ne cesse de se manifester, c'est bien que de l'issue de ce deuxième volet dépend la crédibilité entière des allégations israéliennes, qui soit dit en passant n'ont pas lésiné en moyens pour éluder toute responsabilité :

anita12
Posté le 11-11-2009 à 00:49:43  profilVoir le bbcodeansweranswer +MPFavoris
Prévenir les modérateurs en cas d'abus
 
Le 08-11-2009 à 14:27:42, Esneval a écrit :


Anita, j'ai l'impresonq eu vous mélangez tout, et que vous ne savez pas comment fonctionnent les procédures devant les Tribunaux. Enderlin ni France 2 n'avaient aucune raison de "porter au dossier" la questoin des blessures de Jamal Al Doura : cette question n'existait pas, puisque personne ne la soulevait. Enderlin et France 2 n'ont fait que poursuivre en diffamation des gens qui les accusaient d'avoir filmé une mise en scène. Là, c'est différent : France 2 et Enderlin ne sont pas dans cette nouvelle procédure. Actualité Juive affirme : Jamal al Doura, lui aussi joue la comédie, la preuve, c'est que ses blessures n'existent pas. C'est lui, et lui seul qui attaque en diffamation. Et il découvre que son accusateur n'est autre que Clément Weill-Raynal, rédacteur en chef adjoint à France 3, qui le diffamait sous le pseudo de Daniel Vavinsky pour pouvoir mieux nuire à France 2 et Enderlin. C'est clair, non ?


 
donc cela ne remet pas en cause les conclusions du précèdent procès puisque si j'ai bien compris c'en est un autre! donc attendons;l'issue de ce nouveau procès!
 

Bref, si l'on est intéressé, il faut lire le fil en sautant les parties indigestes, mais une chose est certaine : il en est aujourd'hui à 12 pages, près de 300 messages, dont quantité de copier coller communautaires. L'enjeu est donc indéniable, et la pression est mise de façon récurrente, notamment inaugurée par les fameux :

- Les petites manoeuvres de France 2 pour sauver le soldat Enderlin

http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&q=Les+petites+manoeuvres+de+France+2+pour+sauver+le+soldat+Enderlin&meta=&rlz=1I7GGLL_fr

et

- Faut-il sauver le soldat Enderlin

http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&q=Faut-il+sauver+le+soldat+Enderlin&meta=&rlz=1I7GGLL_fr

deux articles identiques au titre différent, repris un nombre considérable de fois.

LA  PRESSE  FRANCAISE  EST TOUJOURS  MUETTE : PAS  INFORMEE ??


Mardi 17 novembre 2009 2 17 /11 /2009 11:59

Une vidéo témoignage intéressante qui pointe notamment l'importance de la continuelle remise en cause de son savoir, et donc de la flexibilité intellectuelle. Où l'on apprend par exemple que Dieudonné fut favorable à Israël. Réalisé par Clap36.

Pierre Panet est un compagnon de route historique de l’humoriste Dieudonné. Ancien cadre de La Poste et surtout militant politique depuis plus de quarante années, il nous livre sa réflexion concernant la méprise actuelle de celle qu’on appelé avant son décès « la gauche », à propos de l’humoriste le plus ostracisé de notre époque.

Samedi 3 octobre 2009 6 03 /10 /2009 11:15
Je l'ai posté en ces termes sur le post, parce que je trouve qu'il a raison, et qu'il est urgent de réagir. La dérision est un moyen. Ma curiosité est de savoir si la censure va passer.

Quand toutes les limites sont passées, que l'indécence est partout, qu'après avoir massacré sciemment comme ça a été fait à Gaza, l'Etat à l'origine de tant d'ignominie organise sa campagne de propagande Brand Israël, fort justement boycottée à Toronto. Quand le net est sans cesse surveillé, la hasbara informée par le logiciel mégaphone, de sorte que des sayanims (ou propagandistes) débarquent pour venir annuler ce qui bien souvent est un fait documenté, en le pervertissant, quelle autre solution que la dérision ? Pour parenthèse, je précise qu'il existe sur ce site un groupe vérité, dont le seul nom porte à rire, et qui s'il intervient dans mes posts, et donc les lit, n'a toujours pas répondu à ma question documentée sur l'ouverture des archives de Bad Arosen, non encore obtenue en 2007.



Dimanche 20 septembre 2009 7 20 /09 /2009 22:48

Après l'agression du début juillet qui a donné lieu à un mouvement de soutien important devant la librairie et à une pétiton demandant la dissolution de ce groupuscule vénéneux, ça recommence. Pourquoi se gêner quand on sait qu'on ne risque rien ?


Nouvelles menaces de mort envoyées à la Librairie Résistances

 

Publié le 18-09-2009


Un individu nommé Jérôme Drahi (ou Drahy) a comparu jeudi devant la 23ème Chambre correctionnelle du tribunal de Paris, pour des menaces de mort, à caractère raciste, proférées quelques jours plus tôt à l’encontre de la Librairie Résistances (Paris XVIIème) et de ses animateurs.

Voici le message envoyé par Drahi, :

“----- Original Message ----- From : jerome ffeg To : info@librairie-resistances.com Sent : Sunday, September 13, 2009 2:26 PM

MES POTES DE LA LDJ VOUS ONT BIEN NIKER VOTRE LIBRAIRIE RESISTANCEEE HEINN GREGORY ET JASON MES FRERES VOUS ONT BIEN BAISER VOS MERES ET VOS LIVRES A LA CON ET VOUS INKIETTEZ PAS PSKE POUR L INSTANT CE N ETAIT ENCORE KE DES AVERTISSEMENTS...

vous allez gouter a la douleur bande denfoirrer dvos meres les putes ! a mort tout les palestiniens faut les chasser de notre terre et ceux kil veule pa partir : une balle dans la tete par nos soldats de tsahal !

jvous é tous enculer en france et ca va continuer bcq plus ,violement encore et bientot jvé partir en israel construire des belles et grande colonies en territoire ocupé ptite salope on vous nike vos mere koi ki spasse PTITE MERDE

BIENTOT LIBERMANN AU POUVOIR ET DOMAGE KE TONTON RAV MEIR KAHANA NE SOIT PLUS LA POUR ETRE ELU A L HEURE ACTUEL PSK IL AURAI FAIT L MENAGE C UN BON LUI ! »

On ne commentera pas plus avant la prose du sieur Drahi.

Rappelons seulement que lorsqu’il évoque ses « potes » Gregory et Jason, il fait référence à deux nervis notoires, à savoir Grégory Chelly, condamné en juillet pour le saccage de la Librairie Résistances, et Jason T., mis en examen dans au moins une autre affaire de violences.

Nicolas Shahshahani, gérant de la librairie, a déposé plainte lundi 14 septembre. Jeudi à 12h30, il reçoit un appel téléphonique du Parquet de Paris, l’informant que l’auteur des menaces a été arrêté, et qu’il va être jugé, séance tenante.

A l’audience, Drahi, qui se présente comme « auxiliaire d’éducation à temps partiel » dans un établissement secondaire privé a confirmé qu’il avait avoué les faits au cours de sa garde à vue, puis il a demandé le renvoi, comme cela est de droit, pour préparer sa défense. Le procès aura lieu le 22 octobre prochain, devant la même Chambre.

A la différence de la plupart des personnes qui ont comparu jeudi devant la 23ème Chambre correctionnelle, Drahi a quitté le tribunal en homme libre, à l’issue d’une journée où des condamnations à des peines de prison ferme ont été prononcées en série, pour des infractions d’une gravité relative : trois jeunes d’à peine 18 ans ont par exemple pris 8 mois ferme pour une bagarre ayant fait un blessé léger dans le groupe adverse.

Le tribunal a en effet estimé qu’une mesure de contrôle judiciaire (un pointage hebdomadaire au commissariat le plus proche du domicile de l’intéressé, en Seine-et-Marne) suffisait à garantir la présence de Drahi à son procès le mois prochain, et qu’il n’y avait donc pas lieu de placer le prévenu en détention préventive.

L’avocate de la libraririe, partie civile, a quand même fait observer que l’impunité des voyous de l’extrême-droite pro-israélienne a jusqu’à présent été sans limites en France.

Y compris dans les rares cas où des condamnations sont prononcées, les peines, carcérales ou pécuniaires, n’ont en effet jamais le début du commencement d’une application, l’appareil judiciaire se refusant à prendre les diverses mesures pratiques permettant l’exécution des jugements (communication de l’adresse des condamnés pour obtenir les dommages et intérêts, mandats de dépôt pour les peines de prison ferme, signalements aux frontières pour les contrôles judiciaires, etc.)

Rien n’empêche donc Drahi, qui a avoué au cours de sa garde à vue sa volonté de partir en Israël –pour participer au génocide du peuple palestinien, comme il en bave d’envie dans son email- de prendre, quand il le veut, son billet d’avion. A suivre.

CAPJPO-EuroPalestine

Source

 

Tandis que nos médias se taisaient en juillet, Al Jazeera relayait.


 

Samedi 19 septembre 2009 6 19 /09 /2009 20:35

Encore un article que je me promets de traduire depuis longtemps, et je repousse, sollicitée par une autre information. Je l'ai lu peu après avoir vu Missing Links, et les deux m'ont semblés congruents. Je me souviens m'être demandé si le réalisateur de Missing Links n'y avait pas puisé une part de ses infos, sans plus m'y attarder. Mais je suis agacée quand je lis critique sur critique de Hufschmid ou Bollyn pour la bonne et simple raison que depuis longtemps je considère dans le dossier du 9/11 tout particulièrement le message plus important que le messager. On peut tenter de vous apprivoiser en vous communiquant des infos ou éléments dont on sait que vous les recherchez, pour après intervenir d'une autre façon. C'est d'ailleurs ce qui est reproché à Bollyn et Hufschmid, d'être des agents désinformateurs.
C'est pour cette raison très précise que je ne mets pas de liens. Il y a des sites dans lesquels je puise des infos qui, croisées avec celles que j'ai déjà, me semblent plausibles, et sur ces mêmes sites, je vais trouver autre chose qui me semble aberrant. Un exemple récent avec un site québécois que j'aime citer pour leur travail sur les chemtrails et le regroupement de citations, evolutionquebec et sur lequel j'ai vu un témoignage d'une Svali auquel je n'accorde aucun crédit. De ce fait, je suis toujours prête à découvrir que je me suis trompée sur une personne ou un groupe, et me focalise plus sur les informations en elles-mêmes.
Je poste ce texte après l'avoir signalé parce que je le pense fondamental et que je me sens coincée entre les lecteurs qui expriment une frustration à voir des textes anglais qu'ils ne comprennent pas, et la confrontation à d'autres qui regrettent que je n'ai pas communiqué plus tôt un article en anglais, là où j'attendais de l'avoir traduit.


Dual Citizenship -- Loyal to Whom?

 

by Dan Eden

 

Please also see Omert Humiliates America and Who Controls Hollywood and the Media?.

Someone wrote and asked me, "Why are there Israeli- but not Mexican-American Dual Nationals?"

Well, here's my take on this. I'd also like your views and opinions.

Before I begin I'd like to day something important. There is a new law -- the so-called "Hate Speech" law, that just passed the House and is expected to pass the Senate and become law very soon. It was originally designed to guard against discrimination of oppressed minorities but was soon recognized as a way for Israel to forever end any criticism of the state of Israel and Zionism. When it is law, this page, and many like it will be deleted from the internet as yet another mile marker of the infringement of truth and free speech by certain dual-nationals at the expense of true and patriotic Americans. Enough said.

Unless we are Native American Indians, all Americans have their origins in some other country. Both of my parents were from England. They were proud to be "British" but they were most proud of achieving their American citizenship. Sure, we had pictures of the Queen and nick-nacks with the Union Jack on them. My mother even celebrated the traditional 4 o'clock tea time and was good at making Yorkshire Pudding. In the late 60's my older brother served in the US Army and did his tour in Viet Nam. When it came down to "allegiance," we were all patriotic Americans. Period.

The word "allegiance" means that we promise loyalty. It also carries with it the expectation that this loyalty will be exclusive and unrestrained. In the case of a declared war or real threat or conflict, for example, our allegiance to America should preclude any other interest, be it another country or political ideology.

When they took their oath to become American citizens, my parents had to pledge their "allegiance" exclusively to America and renounce their allegiance to "any and all foreign governments." That included Great Britain, one of our strongest allies.

Before Viewzone asked me to research the meaning of "dual citizenship," I had never heard of the term. How could someone be a citizen of two countries at the same time? But I was just ignorant. Dual nationalities and citizenships are quite common.

From my internet research, I learned that in 1997, a French Canadian with a U.S. passport ran for mayor of Plattsburgh, N.Y. He argued that the incumbent spoke French too poorly to be running a city so close to Quebec. He lost. Also in 1997, a retired top American official for the U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) ran for president of Lithuania. He was inaugurated in February to a burst of fireworks!

In 1996, Dominicans from New York not only could vote in the Dominican Republic's presidential elections for the first time, they could vote for a fellow New Yorker. Multiple nationalities have become so commonplace that some analysts fear the trend is undermining the notion of nationhood, particularly in the place with the most diverse citizenry on Earth: the United States.

Debate over the issue intensified in the late 1990s, when Mexico joined the growing list of poor nations that say it's OK for their nationals to be citizens of the countries to which they have migrated. Under the law that took effect in 1998 Mexicans abroad -- most of them in the United States -- will be able to retain Mexican citizenship even if they seek U.S. citizenship. And naturalized Americans of Mexican descent will be able to reclaim their original citizenship. The Mexican government stopped short, for now, of giving expatriates the right to vote.

Security Issues

Since citizenship carries with it a responsibility to be exclusively loyal to one country, the whole concept of dual citizenship and nationality raises questions about which of the dual citizenships have priority. This is extremely important when the two countries have opposing interests. It can be a deadly problem when a dual citizen is in a high position within our American government.

Can one imagine a Japanese citizen serving in the Pentagon during WWII? Or how about a citizen of the Soviet Union holding a cabinet position in the White House during the Cold War?

Today's conflicts are centered in the Middle East. America needs to balance foreign policies towards oil producing Arab nations with our goal being peace and stability in the region. This places a burdon on our government to be even-handed in our dealings with the Arab world and Israel. While the Iraq War was waged on lies about Weapons of Mass Destruction and revenge for 911, the real reason has emerged as a well designed global plan to improve the power and leverage of Israel. Added to this policy is yet another potential blow to American interests and security -- the impending War with Iran. This war will be waged for the security of Israel and will be paid for by the blood of American soldiers and the hard-earned money of American citizens whose quality of life is inversely tied to the cost of petrolium.

Recently, in their much lauded paper, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, Harvard professor, Stephen Walt, and University of Chicago professor, John Mearsheimer, focused attention on the strong Israeli lobby which has a powerful influence over American foreign policies (see BBC article). They detail the influence that this lobby has exerted, forming a series of international policies which can be viewed as in direct opposition to the interests and security of the American people. These acts and policies are more often than not carried out by US government appointees who hold powerful positions and who are dual American-Israeli citizens. Since the policies they support are often exclusively beneficial to Israel, often to the detriment of America, it has been argued that their loyalties are misdirected.

A few classic examples can be cited here.

Jonathan Jay Pollard [right] was an American-Israeli citizen who worked for the US government. He is well known because he stole more secrets from the U.S. than has any other spy in American history. During his interrogation Pollard said he felt compelled to put the "interests of my state" ahead of his own. Although as a U.S. Navy counter-intelligence specialist he had a top-secret security clearance, by "my state" he meant the state of Israel.

Literally tens of thousands of Americans holding U.S. passports admit they feel a primary allegiance to the state of Israel. In many instances, these Americans vote in Israeli elections, wear Israeli uniforms and fight in Israeli wars. Many are actively engaged both in the confiscation of Palestinian lands and in the Israeli political system. Three examples come to mind:

One is Rabbi Meir Kahane, who founded the militant Jewish Defense League in the U.S. in the 1960s, then emigrated to Israel where, eventually, he was elected to the Knesset. Until he was shot and killed at one of his U.S. fund-raising rallies in 1990, the Brooklyn-born rabbi shuttled between Tel Aviv and New York, where he recruited militant American Jews for his activities in Israel against Palestinians. He claimed to be a "dual citizen" of America and Israel.

Another Jewish American, James Mahon from Alexandria, Virginia, reportedly was on a secret mission to kill PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat when he was shot in 1980 by an unknown assailant. When he was shot, Mahon held an American M-16 in his hand and a U.S. passport in his pocket.

Then there was Alan Harry Goodman, an American Jew who left his home in Baltimore, Maryland, flew to Israel and served in the Israeli army. Then, on April 11, 1982, armed with an Uzi submachine gun, he walked, alone, to Al-Aqsa, Jerusalem's most holy Islamic shrine, where he opened fire, killing two Palestinians and wounding others. Both the U.S. and Israeli governments played down the incident, as did the media.

Most recently, US Navy Petty Officer, Ariel J. Weinmann, while serving at or near Bahrain, Mexico, and Austria, "with intent or reason to believe it would be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation (Israel), [attempted] to communicate, deliver or transmit classified CONFIDENTIAL and SECRET information relating to the national defense, to a representative, officer, agent or employee of a foreign government." Weinmann was apprehended on March 26 after being listed as "a deserter by his command," according to the US Navy. The information he gathered was supplied to Israel.

Ben-Ami Kadish, a Connecticut-born U.S. dual citizen who worked in New Jersey was arrested and charged with giving top secret nuclear information and details about the US Patriot Missile to an Israeli agent -- the same agent involved with the Jay Pollard case. The espionage charges reportedly stem from acts committed in the 1980s. These activities, like the ones with convicted spy Pollard, were immediately denied by Israel (Pollard pleaded guilty in 1986). It is further reported that Israeli officials instructed Kadish to lie to US investigators. Kadish was scheduled to be arraigned on April 22, 2008 at U.S. District Court in Manhattan.

 


In 2009 it was revealed that the NSA had secretly taped conversations of Congresswomen Jane Harman [pictured above on the right with Israeli Knesset Speaker, Dalia Itzik] negotiating with two AIPAC spies accused of giving sensitive information about US military activities to the Israeli government. In the taped conversation she is being asked to dismiss their espionage charges in return for large politiacl contributions and (are you ready) a chairmanship of the US Intelligence Committee! One has to assume that they thought they could actually "arrange" for this to happen. This information was secretly revealed by the NSA to Nancy Polosi prior to the selection of the committee chairman and was a factor (let's hope, anyway) in Harmon's failure to obtain this highly sensitive position. After all was said and done, however, the case against the two Israeli lobbyists was dismissed -- against the insistance of the FBI. No satisfactory reason has been given for this.

Unfortunately, such an act of treason remains unchallenged and Jane Harman remains at her congressional job and enjoys being the third wealthiest member of Congress. Only in America!

The examples of Kahane, Mahonm, Goodman and Weinmann raise the question of when a U.S. citizen ceases to be, or should cease to be, a U.S. citizen. U.S. Law at one time clearly stated that an American citizen owed first allegiance to the United States. A U.S. citizen should not fight in a foreign army or hold high office in a foreign country without risking expatriation. What the heck happened?

The 1940 Nationality Act

Section 401 (e) of the 1940 Nationality Act provides that a U.S. citizen, whether by birth or naturalization, "shall lose his [U.S.] nationality by...voting in a political election in a foreign state."

This law was tested many times. In 1958, for instance, an American citizen named Perez voted in a Mexican election. The case went to the Supreme Court, where the majority opinion held that Perez must lose his American nationality. The court said Congress could provide for expatriation as a reasonable way of preventing embarrassment to the United States in its foreign relations.

But then something very odd happened.

In 1967 an American Jew, Beys Afroyim received an exemption that set a precedent exclusively for American Jews. Afroyim, born in Poland in 1895, emigrated to America in 1912, and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1926. In 1950, aged 55, he emigrated to Israel and became an Israeli citizen. In 1951 Afroyim voted in an Israeli Knesset election and in five political elections that followed. So, by all standards he lost his American citizenship -- right? Wrong.

After living in Israel for a decade, Afroyim wished to return to New York. In 1960, he asked the U.S. Consulate in Haifa for an American passport. The Department of State refused the application, invoking section 401 (e) of the Nationality Act -- the same ruling that had stripped the American citizen named Perez of his U.S. citizenship.

Attorneys acting for Afroyim took his case to a Washington, DC District Court, which upheld the law. Then his attorneys appealed to the Court of Appeals. This court also upheld the law. The attorneys for Afroyim then moved the case on to the Supreme Court. Here, with Supreme Court Justice Abe Fortas, Lyndon Johnson's former attorney and one of the most powerful Jewish Americans, casting the swing vote, the court voted five to four in favor of Afroyim. The court held that the U.S. government had no right to "rob" Afroyim of his American citizenship!

The court, reversing its previous judgment as regards the Mexican American, ruled that Afroyim had not shown "intent" to lose citizenship by voting in Israeli elections. Huh?

While Washington claims it has a "good neighbor" policy with Mexico, the U.S. does not permit Mexicans to hold dual nationality. The US makes them become either U.S. or Mexican -- you can't be both. But the U.S., in its special relationship with Israel, has become very sympathetic to allowing Israeli-Americans to retain two nationalities and allowing U.S. citizens not only to hold public office in Israel, but to hold US government positions as well! No other country holds this special exception to our laws of citizenship.

So, you might ask, are there any other dual Israel-American citizens who hold US government positions that could compromise American security? Yes. Consider the following list that I obtained on the web:

 

         

 

 

Michael Mukasey
Recently appointed as US Attorney General. Mukasey also was the judge in the litigation between developer Larry Silverstein and several insurance companies arising from the destruction of the World Trade Center on 9/11/2001.

Michael Chertoff
Former Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division, at the Justice Department; now head of Homeland Security.

Richard Perle
One of Bush's foreign policy advisors, he is the chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. A very likely Israeli government agent, Perle was expelled from Senator Henry Jackson's office in the 1970's after the National Security Agency (NSA) caught him passing Highly-Classified (National Security) documents to the Israeli Embassy. He later worked for the Israeli weapons firm, Soltam. Perle came from one the above mentioned pro-Israel thinktanks, the AEI. Perle is one of the leading pro-Israeli fanatics leading this Iraq war mongering within the administration and now in the media.

Paul Wolfowitz
Former Deputy Defense Secretary, and member of Perle's Defense Policy Board, in the Pentagon. Wolfowitz is a close associate of Perle, and reportedly has close ties to the Israeli military. His sister lives in Israel. Wolfowitz came from the above mentioned Jewish thinktank, JINSA. Wolfowitz was the number two leader within the administration behind this Iraq war mongering. He later was appointed head of the World Bank but resigned under pressure from World Bank members over a scandal involving his misuse of power.

 

       
Lawrence (Larry) Franklin
The former Defense Intelligence Agency analyst with expertise in Iranian policy issues who worked in the office of Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith and reported directly to Feith's deputy, William Luti, was sentenced January 20, 2006, "to more than 12 years in prison for giving classified information to an Israeli diplomat" and members of the pro-Israel lobbying group American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC).

Franklin will "remain free while the government continues with the wider case" and his "prison time could be sharply reduced in return for his help in prosecuting" former AIPAC members Steven J. Rosen and Keith Weissman, [who] are scheduled to go on trial in April [2006]. Franklin admitted that he met periodically with Rosen and Weissman between 2002 and 2004 and discussed classified information, including information about potential attacks on U.S. troops in Iraq. Rosen and Weissman would later share what they learned with reporters and Israeli officials." (source: sourcewatch.com).

 

Douglas Feith
Under Secretary of Defense and Policy Advisor at the Pentagon. He is a close associate of Perle and served as his Special Counsel. Like Perle and the others, Feith is a pro-Israel extremist, who has advocated anti-Arab policies in the past. He is closely associated with the extremist group, the Zionist Organization of America, which even attacks Jews that don't agree with its extremist views. Feith frequently speaks at ZOA conferences. Feith runs a small law firm, Feith and Zell, which only has one International office, in Israel. The majority of their legal work is representing Israeli interests. His firm's own website stated, prior to his appointment, that Feith "represents Israeli Armaments Manufacturer." Feith basically represents the Israeli War Machine. Feith also came from the Jewish thinktank JINSA. Feith, like Perle and Wolfowitz, are campaigning hard for this Israeli proxy war against Iraq.

Feith was investigated by the FBI under suspicion of leaking classified information to Israel, being that he was Larry Franklin's boss when Franklin leaked those documents to Rosen and Weissman of AIPAC. For that he was forced to leave the National Security Council. Feith was also investigated by the Senate Intelligence Committee for sexing up 'intelligence' that was used to justify invading Iraq.

Edward Luttwak
Member of the National Security Study Group of the Department of Defence at the Pentagon. Luttwak is reportedly an Israeli citizen and has taught in Israel. He frequently writes for Israeli and pro-Israeli newspapers and journals. Luttwak is an Israeli extremist whose main theme in many of his articles is the necessity of the U.S. waging war against Iraq and Iran.

Henry Kissinger
One of many Pentagon Advisors, Kissinger sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle. For detailed information about Kissinger's evil past, read Seymour Hersch's book (Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House). Kissinger likely had a part in the Watergate crimes, Southeast Asia mass murders (Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos), Installing Chilean mass murdering dictator Pinochet, Operation Condor's mass killings in South America, and more recently served as Serbia's Ex-Dictator Slobodan Milosevic's Advisor. He consistently advocated going to war against Iraq. Kissinger is the Ariel Sharon of the U.S. Unfortunately, President Bush nominated Kissinger as chairman of the September 11 investigating commission. It's like picking a bank robber to investigate a fraud scandal. He later declined this job under enormous protests.

Dov Zakheim
Dov Zakheim is an ordained rabbi and reportedly holds Israeli citizenship. Zakheim attended Jew's College in London and became an ordained Orthodox Jewish Rabbi in 1973. He was adjunct professor at New York's Jewish Yeshiva University. Zakheim is close to the Israeli lobby.

Dov Zakheim is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a co-author of the Project for the New American Century's position paper, Rebuilding America's Defenses, advocating the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern Muslim nations.

He was appointed by Bush as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Actually, nearly three years earlier, Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. That story, as mentioned, was buried under 9-11's rubble. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim's watch. We can only guess where that cash went.

Despite these suspicions, on May 6, 2004, Zakheim took a lucrative position at Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the most prestigious strategy consulting firms in the world. One of its clients then was Blessed Relief, a charity said to be a front for Osama bin Laden. Booz, Allen & Hamilton then also worked closely with DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is the research arm of the Department of Defense.

Judicial Inc's bio of Dov tells us Zakheim is a dual Israeli/American citizen and has been tracking the halls of US government for 25 years, casting defense policy and influence on Presidents Reagan, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. Judicial Inc points out that most of Israel's armaments were gotten thanks to him. Squads of US F-16 and F-15 were classified military surplus and sold to Israel at a fraction of their value.

 

       
Kenneth Adelman
One of many Pentagon Advisors, Adelman also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle, and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supported going to war against Iraq. Adelman frequently is a guest on Fox News, and often expresses extremist and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. Through his racism or ignorance, he actually called Arabs "anti-Semitic" on Fox News (11/28/2001), when he could have looked it up in the dictionary to find out that Arabs by definition are Semites.

I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby
Vice President Dick Cheney's ex-Chief of Staff. As chief pro-Israel Jewish advisor to Cheney, it helps explains why Cheney is so gun-ho to invade Iran. Libby is longtime associate of Wolfowitz. Libby was also a lawyer for convicted felon and Israeli spy Marc Rich, whom Clinton pardoned, in his last days as president. Libby was recently found guilty of lying to Federal investigators in the Valerie Plame affair, in which Plame, a covert CIA agent, was exposed for political revenge by the Bush administration following her husband's revelations about the lies leading to the Iraq War.

Robert Satloff
U.S. National Security Council Advisor, Satloff was the executive director of the Israeli lobby's "think tank," Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Many of the Israeli lobby's "experts" come from this front group, like Martin Indyk.

Elliott Abrams
National Security Council Advisor. He previously worked at Washington-based "Think Tank" Ethics and Public Policy Center. During the Reagan Adminstration, Abrams was the Assistant Secretary of State, handling, for the most part, Latin American affairs. He played an important role in the Iran-Contra Scandal, which involved illegally selling U.S. weapons to Iran to fight Iraq, and illegally funding the contra rebels fighting to overthrow Nicaragua's Sandinista government. He also actively deceived three congressional committees about his involvement and thereby faced felony charges based on his testimony. Abrams pled guilty in 1991 to two misdemeanors and was sentenced to a year's probation and 100 hours of community service. A year later, former President Bush (Senior) granted Abrams a full pardon. He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Reagan Administration's State Department.

Marc Grossman
Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs. He was Director General of the Foreign Service and Director of Human Resources at the Department of State. Grossman is one of many of the pro-Israel Jewish officials from the Clinton Administration that Bush has promoted to higher posts.

Richard Haass
Director of Policy Planning at the State Department and Ambassador at large. He is also Director of National Security Programs and Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). He was one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the first Bush (Sr) Administration who sat on the National Security Council, and who consistently advocated going to war against Iraq. Haass is also a member of the Defense Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon.

Robert Zoellick
U.S. Trade Representative, a cabinet-level position. He is also one of the more hawkish pro-Israel Jews in the Bush (Jr) Administration who advocated invading Iraq and occupying a portion of the country in order to set up a Vichy-style puppet government. He consistently advocates going to war against Iran.

Ari Fleischer
Ex- White House Spokesman for the Bush (Jr) Administration. Prominent in the Jewish community, some reports state that he holds Israeli citizenship. Fleischer is closely connected to the extremist Jewish group called the Chabad Lubavitch Hasidics, who follow the Qabala, and hold very extremist and insulting views of non-Jews. Fleischer was the co-president of Chabad's Capitol Jewish Forum. He received the Young Leadership Award from the American Friends of Lubavitch in October, 2001.

James Schlesinger
One of many Pentagon Advisors, Schlesinger also sits on the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor, who supported going to war against Iraq. Schlesinger is also a commissioner of the Defense Department's National Security Study Group, at the Pentagon.

David Frum
White House speechwriter behind the "Axis of Evil" label. He lumped together all the lies and accusations against Iraq for Bush to justify the war.

Joshua Bolten
White House Deputy Chief of Staff, Bolten was previously a banker, former legislative aide, and prominent in the Jewish community.

John Bolton
Former UN Representative and Under-Secretary of State for Arms Control and International Security. Bolton is also a Senior Advisor to President Bush. Prior to this position, Bolton was Senior Vice President of the above mentioned pro-Israel thinktank, AEI. He recently (October 2002) accused Syria of having a nuclear program, so that they can attack Syria after Iraq. He must have forgotten that Israel has 400 nuclear warheads, some of which are thermonuclear weapons (according to a recent U.S. Air Force report).

David Wurmser
Special Assistant to John Bolton (above), the under-secretary for arms control and international security. Wurmser also worked at the AEI with Perle and Bolton. His wife, Meyrav Wurmser, along with Colonel Yigal Carmon, formerly of Israeli military intelligence, co-founded the Middle East Media Research Institute (Memri),a Washington-based Israeli outfit which distributes articles translated from Arabic newspapers portraying Arabs in a bad light.

Eliot Cohen
Member of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board under Perle and is another extremist pro-Israel advisor. Like Adelman, he often expresses extremist and often ridiculus anti-Arab and anti-Muslim views. More recently, he wrote an opinion article in the Wall Street Journal openly admitting his rascist hatred of Islam claiming that Islam should be the enemy, not terrorism.

Mel Sembler
President of the Export-Import Bank of the United States. A Prominent Jewish Republican and Former National Finance Chairman of the Republican National Committee. The Export-Import Bank facilitates trade relationships between U.S. businesses and foreign countries, specifically those with financial problems.

Steve Goldsmith
Senior Advisor to the President, and Bush's Jewish domestic policy advisor. He also served as liaison in the White House Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives (White House OFBCI) within the Executive Office of the President. He was the former mayor of Indianapolis. He is also friends with Israeli Jerusalem Mayor Ehud Olmert and often visits Israel to coach mayors on privatization initiatives.

Adam Goldman
White House's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community.

Joseph Gildenhorn
Bush Campaign's Special Liaison to the Jewish Community. He was the DC finance chairman for the Bush campaign, as well as campaign coordinator, and former ambassador to Switzerland.

Christopher Gersten
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Administration for Children and Families at HHS. Gersten was the former Executive Director of the Republican Jewish Coalition, Husband of Labor Secretary.

Mark Weinberger
Assistant Secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Public Affairs.

Samuel Bodman
Deputy Secretary of Commerce. He was the Chairman and CEO of Cabot Corporation in Boston, Massachusetts.

Bonnie Cohen
Under Secretary of State for Management.

Ruth Davis
Director of Foreign Service Institute, who reports to the Office of Under Secretary for Management. This Office is responsible for training all Department of State staff (including ambassadors).

Daniel Kurtzer
Ambassador to Israel.

Cliff Sobel
Ambassador to the Netherlands.

Stuart Bernstein
Ambassador to Denmark.

Nancy Brinker
Ambassador to Hungary

Frank Lavin
Ambassador to Singapore.

Ron Weiser
Ambassador to Slovakia.

Mel Sembler
Ambassador to Italy.

Martin Silverstein
Ambassador to Uruguay.

Lincoln Bloomfield
Assistant Secretary of State for Political Military Affairs.

Jay Lefkowitz
Deputy Assistant to the President and Director of the Domestic Policy Council.

Ken Melman
White House Political Director.

Brad Blakeman
White House Director of Scheduling.

I don't know about you, but dual citizenship is fine with me for an ordinary citizen. But if you hold an official position that demands that you put American interests above all else -- if you should look transparent and fair to the rest of the world regarding your formation of Middle East foreign policies, then this is a dangerous trend. Even if there were no pro-Israeli agenda, the fact that decision makers have a bias or an allegiance to one of the parties involved in the current conflict should have raised red flags long before now.

 


If you think we're being unfair here, ask yourself: How you would react to the Head of Homeland Security if he or she were a dual national with citizenship in Iran, Lebanon or Saudi Arabia? Ask yourself why you don't feel the same about Israeli dual citizenship. Then you will understand how powerful the Israeli lobby has been in "adjusting" your acceptance of their special status.

Hey, I could be way off on this. Let's hear from you.

UPDATE: December 4, 2007

Newsweek's Michael Isikoff reports that Iraq war architect Paul Wolfowitz has been rewarded with a new position in the Bush administration which will allow him to oversee classified intelligence and inform policies on WMD issues.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has offered Wolfowitz, a prime architect of the Iraq War, a position as chairman of the International Security Advisory Board, a prestigious State Department panel, according to two department sources who declined to be identified discussing personnel matters. The 18-member panel, which has access to highly classified intelligence, advises Rice on disarmament, nuclear proliferation, WMD issues and other matters. "We think he is well suited and will do an excellent job," said one senior official.

 

Source

Présentation

  • : Le blog de Nicole
  • Le blog de Nicole
  • : Parler du 9/11 et de sujets connexes, au risque de passer pour conspirationniste. Un 2° blog recense les http://docs-docus-interviews-etc.over-blog.com/

Regards

antisionisme.jpg

    zionist_lies.jpg 

Mensonges sionistes : toute une stratégie !

Sur la prétendue légitimité d'Israël

Faurisson-1989

Contre la Loi Gayssot

  Regard Turc

 

Le hacking

J'ai commencé un deuxième blog, et dès le départ, j'y expérimente la même chose que dans celui-ci, qui est d'une bassesse et d'une lâcheté sans nom. Tout le monde sait maintenant que la moindre critique des actes d'Israël implique de se faire traiter d'antisémite. C'est classique, basique, on connaît tous ce que décrit si bien Shulamit Aloni, ancienne Ministre Israélienne :

Si l'accusation d'antisémitisme était pertinente, il y aurait tout lieu de se demander pourquoi les blogs opposés au sionisme se font hacker. Il y a là une nouvelle preuve des mensonges à répétition. Je ne peux quasiment pas faire un texte sans voir changer le formatage, avoir du mal à sélectionner, voir le texte disparaître, ne pas pouvoir utiliser une fonction standard. Tout cela signe une immaturité grave, permise par les élus qui ne s'opposent en aucune façon à ce que les systèmes d'exploitation vendus d'office avec les machines soient poreux. C'est un choix. Il est techniquement possible d'avoir des machines inviolables, et c'est connu depuis dix ans. Le fait est que ce n'est pas appliqué, et que le hacking est là comme un révélateur de la quantité de choses qu'Israël a à cacher, et des mensonges pathologiques sur lesquels cet état est fondé. A titre d'illustration de ce qu'on est censé taire :

1- les chantages exercés pour obtenir des votes à l'ONU en 1947 :

2-La fabrication de fausses preuves, avant l'attaque

Toujours cliquer sur l'image

Path to 9-11

Les agents du Mossad réjouis

0

Clés de lecture fondamentales

Sionisme et 9/11

Israel.gif

 

Silverstein

 

Lewis Eisenberg

 

Frank Lowy

 

Alvin Hellerstein

 

Selon Alan Sabrovsky, les militaires savent  Israël derrière le 9/11

 

Vidéo de l'entretien en VOST

 

Fil du Forum France 2 qui a battu des records de posts en un temps record

 

 

 

overblog

 
Contact - C.G.U. - Signaler un abus - Articles les plus commentés